Design your life to include more money, health and happiness with less stuff, space and energy.

Design your life to include more money, health and happiness with less stuff, space and energy.

Opinion: Do We Need Anything From the Consumer Electronics Show?

If you’re even remotely a techie, you’re aware that the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) was held in Las Vegas this week. The TVs, game consoles, phones, tablets, and phablets (no, we’re not making that up) of tomorrow are there on display today.

We love the things technology makes possible. We love that our mobile apps do the duty of tons of useful tools. We love that Spotify and Netflix allow us to ditch our CDs and DVDs while giving us access to far more media than we could ever acquire in a lifetime. We love how our eReaders allow us to take our libraries anywhere. All of these things depend on the kind of hardware seen at CES.

The consumer tech industry has a lot to do with Moore’s Law, which says that the number of transistors that can fit on an integrated circuit doubles every two years; it’s a law that has held true for the last 50 years and shows no sign of abating. It has made technological advances occur at breakneck speeds–tech that was state of the art five years ago is considered garbage today. No other industry can say that–not cars, furniture, energy…nothing.

But what about us, the users? Can we keep up with the number of choices and options available? Are we better off with these choices at all?

An insightful article by Treehugger’s Jaymi Heimbuch entitled “CES 2013: The World’s Largest Electronics Tradeshow, Buddhism, and the Illusion of Choice,” waxes about the existential implications of CES. She writes:

We produce too much stuff to the point of redundancy and even ridiculousness. The consumer electronics industry is bound up in this truth: the myriad choices we are given as consumers of gadgets is pure illusion. Instead of freedom through modern gadgetry, we are unwittingly made increasingly unhappy by it.

We’ve explored this philosophical terrain before, asking how less choice might be the route to greater happiness, and conversely how greater options can often make us miserable. While we aren’t at CES ourselves, we imagine the available choices could paralyze someone who just wants a new phone.

While sitting out the tech arms race seems like the way to go, many of us depend on technology and appreciate its applications. As such, we’d just assume our tech be faster, lighter, more efficient, have better sound and display and so forth. We prefer our Samsung Galaxy III to a Palm III. These newer, better devices and all the things we can do on them would not be possible if companies–the same ones on display at the CES–had stood still technologically.

But how do we stop ourselves from stepping on a technological hedonic treadmill, where we get the fastest, thinnest, sexiest device, only to start lusting after the next model released a couple months later?

In our previous post on choice, we looked at the website The Wirecutter, which gets experts to declare a best device in any given category–e.g. best laptop, SLR, external harddrive, etc. If you take their advice, you have the opportunity to eliminate a lot of choice as well as benefitting from their expertise.

One of its contributors, Brian Lam, wrote an opinion piece in the NY Times called “Knowing When It Pays to Upgrade Your Gadgets.” It’s a clearheaded look at how to evaluate if you actually need a new piece of tech hardware.

Lam’s conclusion is basically different people have different tech needs. A graphic designer will need to replace her computer more often than a plumber. He does say that some things, like tablets, seldom need replacement for anyone. He also gives this overarching statement, which, from a tech writer, sounds pretty sage:

No one has ever regretted waiting as long as they can to upgrade their technology. We’re a nation of shoppers, tempted to buy the best at every turn. But I’ve found that the best way to avoid a premature upgrade is to remember what you might be giving up: a trip to a tropical getaway, a new suit or perhaps a down payment on a new bed that will help you sleep better. That kind of context makes it easier to pause and realize the grandest truth with upgrades: If it isn’t broken, stolen or lost, maybe you don’t need a new one just yet.

How about you? How do you balance your technological needs with the endless array of upgrades, faster models, etc.? We’d love to hear your opinions.

image credit: Andrew Harrer for Bloomberg

  • Mary

    “just as soon”

  • I don’t usually upgrade anything as long as it keeps working. But, I have only four gadgets anyway and use them all every day. If one breaks, I need a new one PDQ.

  • Aneesia

    I tend to think about energy efficiency and gardening more…they cut costs, and give us semi-independence. I optimize my desktop computers for efficiency. I play with my wife’s Kindle Fire etc., but reading an exciting book is better than anything on TV….thought public TV is quite good and they don’t chop up shows with rapid sequences with everything done to a beat…and it’s good to have HD.
    I don’t have a cell phone. I want to enjoy my peace of mind when I get it, and don’t need people disturbing it….one day at a time. Enjoying live is too important to spend time with drivel.
    Do I need anything from CES….NO.

  • Mxytsplyk

    ‘..Companies have been working for years to connect our devices — smart appliances that can we can set up and run via our tablet devices, security systems that can be controlled using our smart phones. Even the popular Nest Thermostat is designed to learn our habits and control our home’s heating and cooling all on its own..’

    I had an alarm system with those very same features. It communicated by phone and spoke in english. Arm & disarm, status, zone trips; it could even schedule things like lawn sprinklers. It was very useful and even non techies loved it. Oh, yeah, this was in 1996.

  • Paul

    My advice generally for buying new tech is don’t buy bleeding edge and don’t be the very early adopter. Wait several months (at least). Bleeding edge is usually massively over priced (it will be a lot cheaper very soon), has more bugs and technical issues (read: things will go wrong), and often dies out before it even establishes itself properly (the list of failed technologies is very long).

  • Zoltan

    The only tech news I follow is the smartphone development as that is today’s multitool for everything….for me at least 🙂 so I will try and change my phone every 2-3 years (pushing for 3 rather than 2). We barely watch TV, so I don’t care about how detailed or how big their screens are, and the thought of my TV being ‘smart’ is just freaking me out. Desktop PC….no room, no need, thanks. Tablet: the gap between a smartphone and a laptop is just not big enough, so I am not getting one. Laptop: even the low end is good enough for everyday use, so why bother buying the latest?